Search
BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Does the rule against evidence of subsequent remedial measures apply only to a remedial measure that was taken after the event that caused a harm or injury? Is the rule inapplicable to a remedial measure that was taken after the alleged wrongdoer's defalcation but before any harm was done to the victim of the defalcation or wrong?

Add Comment
Contributed in 2010 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a split , which means there's some disagreement about this topic. See the options in the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The prohibition against circumstantial character evidence applies to non-parties.
complete authority for rule...
The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination confers on a criminal defendant the right to give relevant testimony.
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement can qualify as an excited utterance for purposes of the hearsay exception created by by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable...