VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
200511:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Issues relating to a prima facie case of disparate treatment relating to failure to hire.
Add Comment
Contributed in April 2011 by Nicholas Diamand
Browse from Failure to Hire
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Employment
»
Discrimination
»
Types
»
Disparate treatment
»
Individual
»
Types of disparate treatment
»
Failure to Hire
»
Prima facie case: Issues relating to a...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
For a termination or demotion claim to survive a motion to dismiss, the complaint must allege that the plaintiff (1) "is a member of a protected...Bonds v. Leavitt, 629 F.3d 369, 386 (4th Cir. 2011).
in support of
For a termination or demotion claim to survive a motion to dismiss, the complaint must allege that the plaintiff (1) "is a member of a protected class; (2) she suffered adverse employment action; (3) she was performing her job duties at a level that met her employer's legitimate expectations at the time of the adverse employment action; and (4) the position remained open or was filled by similarly qualified applicants outside the protected class.”complete authority for rule...
Motive for less favorable treatment is discrimination based on a protected classification.Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, n.15 (1977) ("Proof of discriminatory motive is critical" to disparate treatment case.).
in support of
Motive for less favorable treatment is discrimination based on a protected classification.vouch for authority for rule...
It is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of national origin.42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a).
in support of
It is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of national origin.