VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
200740:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
This is a cross reference. Click here to make the jump.
Add Comment
Contributed in August 2011 by Marcia Gelpe
Browse from Corporate family liability
You've hit the end
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
An association of lime manufacturers has shown germaneness in litigation against a regulation applying to portland cement manufacturing facilities...National Lime Ass'n v. EPA, 233 F.3d 625, 636-7 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
in support of
An association of lime manufacturers has shown germaneness in litigation against a regulation applying to portland cement manufacturing facilities where some companies manufacture both cement and lime, both industries share a critical raw material, lime is sometimes used as an ingredient in portland cement, the processes underlying the two types of manufacture are similar, and the two manufacturing processes emit some of the same pollutants.vouch for authority for rule...
In general, the requirements of the PSD program are less strict than those of the nonattainment program.New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3, 13 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (per curiam).
in support of
In general, the requirements of the PSD program are less strict than those of the nonattainment program.vouch for authority for rule...
EPA need not require municipal waste incinerators to undertake programs to reduce the mercury and chlorinated plastics in their waste streams where...Sierra Club v. EPA, 167 F.3d 658, 666 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (interpreting the provision on methods for removal before combustion).
in support of
EPA need not require municipal waste incinerators to undertake programs to reduce the mercury and chlorinated plastics in their waste streams where there is not evidence of the costs of such measures.