Search
BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Circumstances in which there may be a legal presumption that a Rule 10b-5 plaintiff reasonably relied on the defendant's misstatement or omission.

Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 by David Gold
You're at a topic . To narrow down, use the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
To satisfy the scienter element in a claim brought under Rule 10b-5, the plaintiff must show that the speaker acted with intent or a high degree of...
complete authority for rule...
Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, a plaintiff in a private civil action claiming a Rule 10b-5 violation can withstand a...
complete authority for rule...
That following the discovery of misstatements a defendant instituted new controls intended to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future...