Federal Rule of Evidence of Evidence 804(b)(3) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for a statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, that a reasonable person in the declarant's position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true. A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is admissible if there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by a reasonable juror that the other...
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement falls within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) only if the statement is related to a startling event or...
vouch for authority for rule...
The routine practice of an organization is admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 406 or a comparable State rule in order to show the conduct of...