Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
2767:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!3049!:false:-1:-1
Whether poverty is relevant or irrlevant to show motive for an act
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Relevance rules
»
Relevance and prejudice
»
Relevance
»
Relevant evidence admissible
»
Particular matters held relevant under the circumstances
»
Poverty?: Whether poverty is relevant...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Hearsay evidence is inadmissible.United States v. Lopez, 340 F.3d 169, 175-177 (3d Cir. 2003) (reversing convictions for possession of heroin, and possession of contraband by an inmate because "the challenged statements constituted inadmissible hearsay,....
in support of
Hearsay evidence is inadmissible.vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more...Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp., 765 F.2d 456, 464 (5th Cir. 1985) (holding, in plaintiff injured worker's asbestos-related action against defendant corporations for negligence and product liability, that the memoranda [which....
in support of
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more than a certain number of years old, typically twenty years.vouch for authority for rule...
When offered in civil actions, other similar events generally do not constitute character, or propensity, and are therefore not barred by the...Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc., 469 F.3d 416, 426 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding, in plaintiff's civil action for breach of contract, breach of implied warranties, and fraud, that evidence of similar fires at other facilities was properly excluded because
"the propensities of a particular person to...
in support of
When offered in civil actions, other similar events generally do not constitute character, or propensity, and are therefore not barred by the character rule, which prohibits the use of a person's character or propensity to show that person's conduct.