The principle of multiple admissibility: if evidence is inadmissible for one purpose, it may be admissible for another purpose; if evidence is inadmissible to show one fact, the evidence, if relevant to another fact, may be admissible to show the other fact.

United States v. Summers, 414 F.3d 1287, pin? (10th Cir. 2005) ("'Viewing the evidence in its entirety, a conviction must be grounded on more than a suspicion of guilt. United States v. Fox, 902 F.2d 1508, 1513 (10th Cir.....Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.

Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(2) ("In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, a statement made by a declarant while believing that the declarant's death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be impending death.").Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception in a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, for a statement by a declarant made when the declarant believes that his or her death is imminent, about the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believes to be his or her impending death.

United States v. Peneaux, 432 F.3d 882, 892 (8th Cir. 2005) (upholding trial court's admission of the victim child's prior out-of-court statements pursuant to Rule 807 because "there [was] no issue about....The catchall or omnibus hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 807 or a comparable State rule is available only if the proponent of a statement under this exception makes known to the adverse party sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet the statement, the proponent's intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.