Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is admissible if there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by a reasonable juror that the other crime, wrong, or act occurred. Clear and convincing evidence is unnecessary; "sufficient" means only that there must be enough evidence to make the other crime, wrong, or act relevant.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more...
vouch for authority for rule...
To prove the contents of a thing to which the best evidence requirement applies, the original of the thing must be introduced in evidence.
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception for prior testimony applies only if testimony was in fact previously given.