Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is admissible if there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by a reasonable juror that the other crime, wrong, or act occurred. Clear and convincing evidence is unnecessary; "sufficient" means only that there must be enough evidence to make the other crime, wrong, or act relevant.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
An offer of proof is unnecessary if the substance of the excluded evidence is apparent to a reviewing court from the context.
vouch for authority for rule...
An expert witness may base his or her opinion on hearsay evidence if the hearsay evidence relied on by the witness is the type of hearsay...
vouch for authority for rule...
The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause places no limits on the admission at trial of nonhearsay statements made prior to or outside of trial.