Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is admissible if there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by a reasonable juror that the other crime, wrong, or act occurred. Clear and convincing evidence is unnecessary; "sufficient" means only that there must be enough evidence to make the other crime, wrong, or act relevant.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
A subsequent remedial measure is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in the product or its design, or a need for warning...
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception for former testimony can apply even if the issues in the former proceeding were not the same or were not substantially the...
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence to rehabilitate a witness after impeachment must be relevant to the impeaching evidence: the rehabilitation evidence must have some...