Examples of other factors -- factors in addition to rates of error, testing and empirical verification, and general scientific acceptance -- that a trial court may consider when determining whether scientific or expert evidence offered by a party is sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 for the admissibility of scientific or expert evidence.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You're at a topic . To narrow down, use the menu box on the right.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The trial court determines whether a person is a competent expert.
complete authority for rule...
Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.
complete authority for rule...
The exclusion of relevant exculpatory evidence offered by a defendant in a trial does not violate a defendant's right to due process or compulsory...