3134:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Expert testimony that a witness is truthful or that a witness is untruthful is inadmissible.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Law
»
Courts
»
Evidence
»
Admissibility of evidence
»
Witness competence & credibility
»
Impeachment and rehabilitation of witnesses
»
Impeachment
»
In general a party has the right to impeach any witness
»
Different types of impeachment permissible
»
Untruthfulness
»
Types of evidence
»
Expert evidence about truthfulness inadmissible: Expert testimony that...

Chiropractic is sufficiently reliable and scientific to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the...
Evidence of a person's other sexual misconduct is frequently admissible in sexual assault cases, child molestation cases, and in civil cases...
When offered in civil actions, other similar events generally do not constitute character, or propensity, and are therefore not barred by the...