3150:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

In a jurisdiction that authorizes the admission of evidence of another sexual assault by a criminal defendant who is on trial for sexual assault, the trial court can exclude the evidence of another sexual assault or assaults if the trial court finds that the harm or potential harm of such evidence of another sexual assault or assaults substantially outweighs the probative value of the evidence of the other assault or assaults.
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2010 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a general rule
, a rule with exceptions. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Be a contributor: - Vouch for this authority if you've read it and agree that it supports this rule. Hover over it and click "vouch."
- Edit to correct an error in an authority. Hover and click "edit."
- Add another authority to this rule by clicking "contribute new authority."
- Comment by clicking "add comment" just below the authority.
Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
Aside from the lack of exceptions, why can't you narrow things down further? You may be finished with this point — you can go back to branch out — or this rule might need to grow.