If some human utterance has legal significance under applicable substantive law and the utterance is offered to establish that a verbal act having such legal significance has taken place, the utterance is not hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(c) or a "statement" for purposes of Federal Rule of Evidence 801(a)(2) even if the utterance also contains an assertion or appears to contain an an assertion.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
A party objecting to an offer of evidence need not state the ground of its objection if the ground of the objection is already apparent.
vouch for authority for rule...
A person's propensity, or character, is not barred by the character rule if it is offered for any purpose other than to show a person's conduct on...
vouch for authority for rule...
Federal Rule of Evidence of Evidence 804(b)(3) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for a statement which was at the time of its...