A pretrial identification is exempt from the federal hearsay rule only if the declarant -- the witness who makes the pretrial identification -- makes the pretrial identification after perceiving the person the witness so identified.

Orr v. Bank of America, NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 779 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding, in plaintiff employee's against against defendant bank for intentional interference, that the depositions were inadmissible hearsay evidence because....A statement can be hearsay only if the statement is "offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted." The purpose for which a statement is offered depends on the purpose of the offeror of the statement. Hence, a statement is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted if the offeror (normally trial counsel) seeks to use the statement to show that the matter or proposition asserted by the declarant (the maker of the statement) is in fact true.

United States v. Mandycz, 447 F.3d 951, 966 (6th Cir. 2006) (upholding trial court's admission of the Soviet interrogation records as ancient documents because defendant failed to prove that the Soviet interrogation....Federal Rule of Evidence 803(16) and comparable State rules create a hearsay exception for statements in an authenticated document that is more than a certain number of years old, typically twenty years.

United States v. Cerno, 529 F.3d 926, pin? (10th Cir. 2008) (conviction for aggravated sexual abuse in Indian country; defendant, invoking Fed.R.Evid. 403, contended that his conviction must be reversed because the district court improperly allowed the prosecutor to question...Under some circumstances untruthfulness is admissible to impeach a witness.