318:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

In order to qualify as "strong" within the meaning of section 21D(b)(2) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, an inference of scienter must be cogent and at least as compelling as any plausible opposing inference of nonfraudulent intent.
Contributed in 2008 by David Gold
You've come to a rule
. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Be a contributor: - Vouch for this authority if you've read it and agree that it supports this rule. Hover over it and click "vouch."
- Edit to correct an error in an authority. Hover and click "edit."
- Add another authority to this rule by clicking "contribute new authority."
- Comment by clicking "add comment" just below the authority.
Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
Move on: Narrow things down using the menu box on the right, or go back to branch out in a different direction.