A declarant's pretrial statement is admissible as nonhearsay under the federal hearsay exemption for prior consistent statements only if the prior statement is consistent with the declarant's trial testimony or with some other admitted hearsay statement by a declarant whose credibility has been attacked.

United States v. Yarbough, 527 F.3d 1092, 1100-1103 (10th Cir. 2008) (conviction of a Tulsa police officer for obstructing an official proceeding, conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, and providing unlawful notice of a search or seizure warrant; accused argued in part that the district court...When an exception to the character evidence prohibition makes evidence of a criminal defedant's character admissible, the testimony of a witness on direct examination about the defendant's character must take the form of reputation or opinion and it cannot consist of specific instances of the defendant's conduct.

See Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc. v. Cajun Construction Services, Inc., 45 F.3d 96, 99 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding, in an action for recovery of money, that the district court erred in refusing to consider plaintiff's evidence of defendant's routine practice for loading its trucks because...Habit is a regular response to a specific situation.

United States v. Valadez-Gallegos, 162 F.3d 1256, 1262 (10th Cir. 1998) ("However, we may not uphold a conviction obtained by piling inference upon inference. United States v. Jones, 44 F.3d 860, 865 (10th Cir. 1995). 'An inference is reasonable only if the conclusion flows from logical and probabilistic...Inferences based on inferences are permissible