VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
3187:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Admissions can rest on hearsay and they need not rest on personal knowledge.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Browse from ... the statement is about matter within scope of employee's or agent's employment or agency, and ...
You've hit the end
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
Other similar events or accidents are generally admissible in civil actions to show the occurrence of an event or accident that is in issue at the...Hayes v. Larsen's Mfg. Co., 871 F. Supp. 56, pin? (D. Me. 1994) (dictum: "In determining the apparent risk in a negligence action, the Court may consider the evidence, or lack thereof, of other similar injuries with respect to the product in question. Such a lack of "evidence...
in support of
Other similar events or accidents are generally admissible in civil actions to show the occurrence of an event or accident that is in issue at the trial.vouch for authority for rule...
No objection is necessary to preserve the point that it is error for a judge who presides at a trial to serve as a witness at that trial.Fed. R. Evid. 605 ("No objection need be made in order to preserve the point.").
in support of
No objection is necessary to preserve the point that it is error for a judge who presides at a trial to serve as a witness at that trial.vouch for authority for rule...
A prior inconsistent statement is exempt from the federal hearsay rule pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) or by a comparable State...United States v. Butterworth, 511 F.3d 71, 74-75 (1st Cir. 2007) (upholding trial court's admission of grand jury testimony of defendant's girlfriend to cross-examine her after she gave testimony that was inconsistent with....
in support of
A prior inconsistent statement is exempt from the federal hearsay rule pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) or by a comparable State rule only if the prior statement is in fact inconsistent with the declarant's testimony at the trial or with some other statement of the declarant that is admitted into evidence pursuant to some hearsay exemption or exception.