A statement can qualify as an excited utterance for purposes of the hearsay exception created by by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule only if the declarant (the maker of the statement) personally perceived the exciting event or condition to which his or her statement relates.

United States v. Guidry, 456 F.3d 493, 500-501 (5th Cir. 2006) (upholding trial court's admission of accused's other sexual assaults because, even though accused had not been convicted for the said offenses, Rule 413 does not limit admissibility of evidence of the act of doing or perpetrating other sexual...Evidence of a person's other sexual misconduct is frequently admissible in sexual assault cases, child molestation cases, and in civil cases involving claims of sexual misconduct.

United States v. Seymour, 468 F.3d 378, 387 (6th Cir. 2006) (upholding trial court's exclusion of victim's past sexual behavior because the defendant failed to follow the notice requirement before offering such evidence of victim's specific instances of sexual behavior to prove consent).If a party in a case involving a charge or claim of sexual assault intends to offer evidence of the sexual disposition of the victim or the sexual conduct of the victim on other occasions to show the alleged victim's consent to sexual relations with the party charged with sexual assault, the offeror may be required by a rape shield law to give advance notice of the offeror's intent to do so.

Fed. R. Evid. 406 ("Evidence ... of the routine practice of an organization ... is relevant to prove that the conduct of the ... organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice.").The routine practice of an organization is admissible to show conduct on a specific occasion.