A statement falls within the hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule for excited utterances, only if the declarant (the maker of the statement) was under the stress of the startling event or condition when he or she made the statement that relates to that startling event or condition.

Contributed in 2009 by Joannes Vinarao-Pilapil
Last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
The admission of a statement made other than at the trial does not violate the right of confrontation guaranteed to a criminal defendant by the...
vouch for authority for rule...
Other crimes, wrongs, or acts are admissible and do not violate the prohibition against the use of character to show conduct if such acts are...
complete authority for rule...
Some courts have approved and some courts have criticized jury instructions saying that proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof of guilt to a...