Document must have been prepared in the normal course of business.

Johnson v. Hugo's Skateway, 974 F.2d 1408, 1413 (4th Cir. 1992) (ordering new trial in racial harassment and intimidation action in which the trial court excluded evidence of the consent order since it proved the truth of....Although settlement negotiations and offers are inadmissible (i) to show the validity or invalidity of a claim when validity is in dispute, (ii) to show the amount of damages when the amount is in dispute, or (iii) to impeach by showing a prior inconsistent statement or specific contradiction, such settlement offers and negotiations are admissible if they are used to impeach a witness by showing the bias or interest of the witness.

Raymond v. Raymond Corp., 938 F.2d 1518, 1523 (1st Cir. 1991) (holding, in plaintiff administratrix's product liability action against defendant manufacturer, that evidence of post-accident modifications [which consisted....Although subsequent remedial measures may not be used to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in the product or its design, or a need for warning or instruction, subsequent remedial measures are admissible to show the feasibility of precautionary measures.

United States v. Schreane, 331 F.3d 548, 563-565 (6th Cir. 2003) (upholding trial court's ruling which allowed Officer Topping's testimony [about Duckett's statement during the stop] as an excited utterance because "Officer....A statement falls within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) only if the statement is related to a startling event or condition.