3344:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
To qualify as an excited utterance under the hearsay exception created by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) or a comparable State rule, a statement need not be contemporaneous with the startling event or condition to which the statement relates: the statement may be made after the startling event or condition.
Contributed in 2009 by Peter Tillers
Last edited in 2010 by David Gold
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Why can't you narrow this down further? You may be finished with this point — you can go back to branch out — or this rule might need to grow.
Be a contributor: - Vouch for this authority if you've read it and agree that it supports this rule. Hover over it and click "vouch."
- Edit to correct an error in an authority. Hover and click "edit."
- Add another authority to this rule by clicking "contribute new authority."
- Comment by clicking "add comment" just below the authority.
Your name will appear, linked to your Spindle profile page.
You've hit the end
Browse from 
VIEW TREE
ICON KEY