A prior inconsistent statement is exempt from the federal hearsay rule pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) or by a comparable State rule only if the prior statement is in fact inconsistent with the declarant's testimony at the trial or with some other statement of the declarant that is admitted into evidence pursuant to some hearsay exemption or exception.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
To fall within the hearsay exception provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) or a comparable State rule for person's present internal states,...
vouch for authority for rule...
Other wrongs or crimes that show an unusual pattern of conduct by a person are not barred by the prohibition against the use of character or...
vouch for authority for rule...
The so-called undue prejudice rule empowers a trial judge to exclude relevant and probative evidence in order to reduce the risk of prejudice and...