To qualify a statement as a statement of present sense impression for purposes of the hearsay exception by that name, it need not be shown that the statement was spontaneous.

United States v. Gabe, 237 F.3d 954, 960 (8th Cir. 2001) (upholding trial court's admission of testimony about two prior incidents of sexual abuse because it was probative as "it tends to prove [accused's] propensity to molest young children in his family when presented with an opportunity to do so...Federal Rule of Evidence 414 and comparable rules in a few States create an exception to the prohibition against "circumstantial" use of character -- the prohibition against the use of character to show conduct -- by providing that in a criminal trial for child molestation or child sexual abuse, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of child molestation or child sexual abuse is relevant and admissible.

United States v. Turning Bear, 357 F.3d 730, 733-734 (8th Cir. 2004) (conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of his son and daughter; accused challenged the trial court's exclusion of testimony from a foster care parent who saw the son on a daily basis for four to six months, and that in her opinion, the...Under some circumstances untruthfulness is admissible to impeach a witness.

United States v. Malik, 928 F.2d 17, 22 (1st Cir. 1991) (conviction for conspiracy to import heroin and for importing heroin; on appeal, accused argued that the government used his statement to another person that accused had previously participated in a bad act, which in turn helped to show his bad...The principle of multiple admissibility: if evidence is inadmissible for one purpose, it may be admissible for another purpose; if evidence is inadmissible to show one fact, the evidence, if relevant to another fact, may be admissible to show the other fact.