Search
BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

The Supreme Court of the United States has declared that certain types of statements are either "testimonial" or "non-testimonial" and are therefore either subject to or exempt from, respectively, the right of confrontation guaranteed to criminal defendants in both federal and state trials by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Add Comment
Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule without any authorities. Be the first to add one!

Move on: Narrow down using the menu box on the right, or go back to branch out in a different direction.
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The habit of a natural person is admissible to show the person's conduct on a particular occasion.
complete authority for rule...
The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States bars the introduction against a criminal...
complete authority for rule...
The determination of facts and the accurate determination of facts are important purposes of the process of proof and the law of evidence in America.