In a civil action the hearsay exception for prior testimony can apply even if the prior testimony was offered against another party in the previous proceeding. It is enough if the party against whom the prior testimony was a predecessor in interest that had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the declarant's testimony the in the prior proceeding by direct, cross, or redirect examination.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
The exclusion of exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial does not violate the due constitutional right to present a defense if the grounds for...
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement by a co-conspirator of a party is not barred by the hearsay rule from being admitted against the party if the statement was made by the...
vouch for authority for rule...
The hearsay exception for "business records" recognized by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) or a comparable State rule applies only if the record...