A factor that weighs in favor of the characterization of a hearsay statement as "testimonial" and in favor of the conclusion that the statement is subject to the constraints on admissibility imposed by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that a reasonable declarant would have thought that his or her statement would significantly increase the probability of criminal charges against the defendant.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
If a pattern of behavior of a natural person does not rise to the status of a habit, it may constitute a character trait and such non-habitual...
vouch for authority for rule...
If a defamatory statement impugns a person's character and if truth is a defense, character may be admissible to show that the otherwise defamatory...
complete authority for rule...
Although proof of criminal guilt can rest on chains of inferences, such pyramided inferences must be reasonable.