A statement made by a criminal defendant during custodial interrogation by law enforcement officials is normally considered "testimonial" and the use of such a statement by a defendant in the defendant's criminal trial to prove the truth of the matter asserted by the defendant is therefore subject to the constraints imposed by the right of confrontation guaranteed to defendants in state and federal trials by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
It is possible that persons may be disqualified from serving as witnesses on grounds not expressly enumerated in codes of evidence or by general...
complete authority for rule...
There is scattered federal authority that polygraph test results are admissible under some circumstances on the issue of the truthfulness or...
vouch for authority for rule...
Evidence of another crime, wrong, or act is not barred by the prohibition against circumstantial use of character if such other crime, wrong, or...