39:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

A defendant may be liable for violating Rule 10b-5 even without purchasing or selling a security.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in June 2011 by David Gold
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Securities
»
Liability & enforcement
»
Fraud claims
»
SEC Rule 10b-5
»
Substance
»
Liability
»
Primary
»
Types of claims (by types of wrongs)
»
Misstatement/omission claims (10b-5(b))
»
Elements
»
Individual elements
»
Connection with Purchase/Sale of Security
»
Connection
»
Defendants & their deceptions
»
Defendant needn't be buyer/seller: A defendant may be liable...

It has not been decided whether a showing that the defendant acted recklessly can satisfy the scienter element of a Rule 10b-5 claim.
A defendant may be liable for violating Rule 10b-5 even without purchasing or selling a security.
Vague optimistic statements that amount to mere puffery, even if false, do not satisfy the materiality element of a Rule 10b-5 claim.