Sign In Sign Up Contact

Search

BROWSE SEARCH SPINDOC HELP

Browse from Strength of particular inferences

view tree to see hierarchy and quickly navigate

view icon key

Law »

Courts »

Evidence »

Admissibility of evidence »

Relevance rules »

Relevance and prejudice »

Relevance and constitutional requirements »

Constitutional limits on exclusion of exculpatory evidence »

Due Process »

But exclusion constitutional if not arbitrary or disproportionate »

Exclusion of weak or immaterial evidence: not arbitrary or disproportionate: The exclusion of exculpatory...

3956:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:false:!:false:-1:-1

Rule: a rule of law

The exclusion of exculpatory evidence in a criminal trial does not violate the constitutional right to present a defense and is not constitutionally arbitrary or disproportionate if the excluded evidence either is immaterial or has very little or no probative value.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers

All (3) Cases (3) Statutes, Regs, Rules (0)

3 case authorities.

Sorted By Date Sort By Court

You've come to a rule

. Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...

Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.

Contribution Suggestions

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Federal Rule of Evidence 902(4) provides that a document is sufficiently authenticated to be admissible if the document appears to be a certified...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(5) and comparable State rules allow identification of a person's voice -- they allow identification of a speaker --...

vouch for authority for rule...

Rule: a rule of law

To qualify as a statement of present sense impression for purposes of the hearsay exception by that name, the statement made by the declarant (the...

view more suggestions