A duplicate of an original is admissible to the same extent as the original if (1) there is no genuine question about the authenticity of the original, and (2) admission of the duplicate in lieu of the original is not unfair.

United States v. Fujii, 301 F.3d 535, 539 (7th Cir. 2002) (upholding trial court's admission into evidence of the check-in and reservation records as business records because they "were compiled and maintained in....Document must have been prepared in the normal course of business.

United States v. Reed, 227 F.3d 763, 767 (7th Cir. 2000) (upholding trial court's ruling to admit Simmons's prior testimony because he was unavailable).If the declarant is unavailable, Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) or a comparable State rule creates a hearsay exception for testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of the same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.

Fed. R. Evid. 412.Rape shield laws limit the introduction in trials involving charges or claims of sexual assault or sexual misconduct, of evidence of the sexual disposition or other sexual conduct of an alleged victim of a sexual assault or sexual misconduct.