Expert, scientific, or specialized evidence satisfies the requirements under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or similar rules for the admissibility of expert, scientific, or specialized evidence, only if the expert, scientific, or specialized field or method is shown to be reliable. "Reliability" for this purpose is more than bare relevance but the expert evidence does not have to satisfy the burden of proof applicable to the fact for which the expert, scientific, or specialized evidence is offered.

Contributed in 2009 & last edited in 2009 by Peter Tillers
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
A person's other crimes, wrongs, or acts are not barred by the character rule either if they are not offered to show that person's propensity or if...
vouch for authority for rule...
If a criminal defendant offers evidence of his or her character circumstantially - to show he or she did not commit the crime charged -- the...
vouch for authority for rule...
A statement qualifies as a statement against interest for purposes of the hearsay exception for statements against interest only if the statement,...