Astrology is not a valid science and "expert" astrological evidence does not satisfy the admissibility requirements under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules; astrology is "junk science."

Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(C) ("identification of a person made after perceiving the person").A pretrial identification is exempt from the federal hearsay rule only if the declarant -- the witness who makes the pretrial identification -- makes the pretrial identification after perceiving the person the witness so identified.

Fed. R. Evid. 414(d) ("For purposes of this rule and Rule 415..., an "offense of child molestation" means a crime under Federal law or the law of a State (as defined in section 513 of title 18, United States Code) that involved-- (1) any conduct proscribed by chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code, that was committed in relation to...Applicable federal or state law determines what constitutes "child molestation" or "child sexual abuse" for purposes of Federal Rule of Evidence 414 or comparable State rules that authorize the use of other instances of child molestation or child sex abuse against criminal defendants who are on trial for child molestation or child sexual abuse.

Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, pin? (1999) (_Daubert_'s requirement of reliability for admissibility applies to non-scientific expert evidence as well as to expert evidence based on scientific principles and methods; trial court has the the duty and the authority...The trial court must act as an independent gatekeeper. The trial court can admit expert or scientific evidence only if it finds that scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.