In determining whether the inference drawn by the plaintiff is cogent and at least as compelling as alternative inferences, such as to support a denial of a motion to dismiss a Rule 10b-5 claim, the court applies a reasonable person test.

Contributed in 2008 by David Gold
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
In order to satisfy the pleading standard of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in pleading the subjective falsity of a speaker's...
complete authority for rule...
Because materiality in a Rule 10b-5 claim is a mixed question of law and fact, it is generally inappropriate to decide the question on pre-trial...
vouch for authority for rule...
Losses from sales of securities to foreigners outside the United States do not give rise to federal subject matter jurisdiction over a resulting...