The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requires plaintiffs pleading a Rule 10b-5 violation to state with particularity the facts constituting the alleged misstatement or omission, including allegations illustrating precisely why the challenged statement is misleading.

Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2008 by David Gold
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
The greater the evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship, over time, between unexpected events relevant to a security's price and an immediate...
vouch for authority for rule...
In order for in pari delicto to serve as a successful defense to a Rule 10b-5 claim, the preclusion of the claim must not otherwise significantly...
complete authority for rule...
The misstatement or omission of an item on a financial statement is generally immaterial if it falls below a 5% threshold.