The requirement of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that, as to each allegation of a misstatement or omission that is based on information and belief, the plaintiff must state "with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed" means that the plaintiff must plead facts sufficient to allow a reasonable person to conclude that the misstatement or omission element of the Rule 10b-5 claim is satisfied.

Contributed in 2008 by David Gold
You've come to a rule . Check out the authorities below. When you find one you like, add it to your SpinDoc. more...
Please sign in or sign up to see the authorities.
Contribution Suggestions
complete authority for rule...
It has not been decided whether a showing that the defendant acted recklessly can satisfy the scienter element of a Rule 10b-5 claim.
complete authority for rule...
In a Rule 10b-5 action, general cautionary language does not render omission of specific adverse historical facts immaterial.
vouch for authority for rule...
Statements about the future do not become actionable misstatements under Rule 10b-5 merely because they later turned out to have been incorrect.