VIEW TREE
ICON KEY
711:false:false:false:false:false:false:true:false:false:!:false:-1:-1
Whether a plaintiff in a Rule 10b-5 claim must allege loss causation with specificity.
Add Comment
Contributed in 2008 & last edited in 2008 by David Gold
Browse from Yes
Law
»
Commerce, labor, particular activities & industries
»
Securities
»
Liability & enforcement
»
Fraud claims
»
SEC Rule 10b-5
»
Procedure
»
District court
»
Pleadings
»
Pleading standards
»
Special issues
»
Pleading loss causation
»
Specificity required?: Whether a plaintiff in...
Narrow Down
Contribution Suggestions
vouch for authority for rule...
Because the "in connection with" requirement of Rule 10b-5 applies flexibly, it extends to create liability for an agent's unauthorized sale of a...Siepel v. Bank of America, N.A., 526 F.3d 1122, 1127 (8th Cir. 2008).
in support of
Because the "in connection with" requirement of Rule 10b-5 applies flexibly, it extends to create liability for an agent's unauthorized sale of a customer's securities.vouch for authority for rule...
There is no private right of action under Rule 10b-5 for mere holders of securities.Cf. Jacobs v. Winthrop Financial Associates, 77 F. Supp. 2d 206, 208-09 (D. Mass. 1999) (discussing purchaser/seller standing in the context of the "forced seller" doctrine).
in support of
There is no private right of action under Rule 10b-5 for mere holders of securities.complete authority for rule...
In a in Rule 10b-5 claim in which the defendant's alleged misstatements were oral, common issues generally do not predominate for purposes of...Spencer v. Central States, 778 F. Supp. 985, 991 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
in support of
In a in Rule 10b-5 claim in which the defendant's alleged misstatements were oral, common issues generally do not predominate for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).