Comments on: <div class="top"><div class="topImages"></div></div><div class="fullNodeLong"><img class="TOPIC" src="/clear.cache.gif" title="Topic: a topic of law"><div class="nodeLongText"><h1><a href="/branch/4315/Reliability-or-unreliability-of-assorted-fields-and-methods">Whether various fields or methods that are said to be scientific, expert, or specialized knowledge are sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the admissibility of expert evidence</a></h1></div></div><div class="contributors"><div><span class="contributorLabel">Contributed <span title="Fri Apr 24 05:05:19 UTC 2009">in 2009</span> & last edited <span title="Tue Oct 20 16:13:09 UTC 2009">in 2009</span> by </span><span id="nodeCreator" user="50" class="contributorName">Peter Tillers</span></div></div>

Comments on: <div class="top"><div class="topImages"></div></div><div class="fullNodeLong"><img class="TOPIC" src="/clear.cache.gif" title="Topic: a topic of law"><div class="nodeLongText"><h1><a href="/branch/4315/Reliability-or-unreliability-of-assorted-fields-and-methods">Whether various fields or methods that are said to be scientific, expert, or specialized knowledge are sufficiently reliable to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or comparable State rules for the admissibility of expert evidence</a></h1></div></div><div class="contributors"><div><span class="contributorLabel">Contributed <span title="Fri Apr 24 05:05:19 UTC 2009">in 2009</span> & last edited <span title="Tue Oct 20 16:13:09 UTC 2009">in 2009</span> by </span><span id="nodeCreator" user="50" class="contributorName">Peter Tillers</span></div></div> http://www.spindlelaw.com Legal research